title

مطالعه مقايسه ای دو روش ارزیابی وکاهش خطای انسانی و آنالیز خطا با تاکید بر قابلیت اطمینان شناختی انسان در اتاق کنترل صنعت سیمان

بابایی پویا, امین ، حبیبی, احسان اله (1394) مطالعه مقايسه ای دو روش ارزیابی وکاهش خطای انسانی و آنالیز خطا با تاکید بر قابلیت اطمینان شناختی انسان در اتاق کنترل صنعت سیمان. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering ــ 4 (1). شاپا 2277-9183

متن کامل

[img]
پیش نمایش
متنی
849kB

آدرس اینترنتی رسمی : http://www.ijehe.org/article.asp?issn=2277-9183;ye...


عنوان انگليسی

The comparative study of evaluating human error assessment and reduction technique and cognitive reliability and error analysis method techniques in the control room of the cement industry

خلاصه انگلیسی

Aims: The present study aimed to evaluate the assessment methods of human errors and compare the results of these techniques in order to introduce the precise method of human error assessment, and recognize the factors affecting the occurrence of these errors. Materials and Methods: This case study was done at three workstation control room of a cement industry in 2014. After determining the responsibilities and critical jobs by hierarchical task analysis, cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) and human error assessment and reduction technique (HEART) were used in order to analyze the human errors. Results: The results showed that in the CREAM method, the highest probability of error occurrence is related to monitoring and control (operator) with a probability of 0.207, and that of in the HEART method, is related to control signs (operator) with a probability of 0.416. The number of errors detected by CREAM and HEART method were 85 and 80, respectively. Time and cost of applying the CREAM methods were 235 h and 1175($), while those in the HEART techniques were 215 h and 1075($). Conclusion: We concluded that the highest probability of calculated errors relates to “monitoring and control (operator),” “controlling warning signs (operators),” and “cooperation in solving the problem (supervisor)” for both techniques. By considering the time and cost factors, HEART has superiority, while CREAM is better due to its extensive evaluation and the number of detected errors.

نوع سند :مقاله
زبان سند : انگلیسی
نویسنده اول :امین بابایی پویا
نویسنده مسئول :احسان اله حبیبی
ضریب تاثیر و نمایه مجلات:Indexed in: DOAJ, Index Copernicus
کلیدواژه ها (انگلیسی):Cement industry, cognitive reliability and error analysis method,human error assessment and reduction technique human error assessment and reduction technique
موضوعات :WA بهداشت عمومي > WA 400 بهداشت حرفه ای
WA بهداشت عمومي > WA 400 بهداشت حرفه ای
بخش های دانشگاهی :دانشکده بهداشت > گروه بهداشت حرفه ای
کد شناسایی :8749
ارائه شده توسط : آقای امین بابائی پویا
ارائه شده در تاریخ :07 شهریور 1396 06:46
آخرین تغییر :07 شهریور 1396 06:46

فقط پرسنل کتابخانه صفحه کنترل اسناد

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...